<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>meme patch &#187; Financial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jamhome.us/about/financial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jamhome.us</link>
	<description>Sauntering Around Ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 18:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>4th Grader Explains How to Become Wealthy</title>
		<link>http://www.jamhome.us/2010/01/4th-grader-explains-how-to-become-wealthy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jamhome.us/2010/01/4th-grader-explains-how-to-become-wealthy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamhome.us/?p=929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s from ptMoney. <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.jamhome.us/2010/01/4th-grader-explains-how-to-become-wealthy/">4th Grader Explains How to Become Wealthy</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/images/financial-house-full.png" alt="House full of finance truisms" /> <br />That&#8217;s from <a href="http://ptmoney.com/2009/04/08/how-to-be-a-millionaire-as-explained-by-a-4th-grader/">ptMoney</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jamhome.us/2010/01/4th-grader-explains-how-to-become-wealthy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Midnight Candles</title>
		<link>http://www.jamhome.us/2009/10/midnight-candles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jamhome.us/2009/10/midnight-candles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamhome.us/?p=903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A cold wind from the future blows into my nighttime bedroom, more often than not during those midnight hours when fear dominates and hope retreats to a netherworld. This wind is a spectre, an oracle of darkness and eventual death, not easily dismissed. Once merely a whisper, its decibels intensify with the advancing years. It [...] <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.jamhome.us/2009/10/midnight-candles/">Midnight Candles</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="indent">A cold wind from the future blows into my nighttime bedroom, more often than not during those midnight hours when fear dominates and hope retreats to a netherworld. This wind is a spectre, an oracle of darkness and eventual death, not easily dismissed. Once merely a whisper, its decibels intensify with the advancing years. It will be heard, this reaper – this grim reaper, yet in the nights when it howls the loudest I fight back, silently screaming for it to get out, to leave me alone, to let it all be a bad dream. It never is. Shakespeare’s Macbeth expressed it more subtly: “Out, out, brief candle!” Yet the finer words provide no solace; the final act is always the same.
</p>
<p>
So Bill Gross begins <a href="http://www.pimco.com/LeftNav/Featured+Market+Commentary/IO/2009/Midnight+Candles+Gross+November.htm">Midnight Candles</a>.  Is this a horror story?  Perhaps a bit of fantasy fiction?  Neither.  <i>Midnight Candles</i> is the November 2009 installment of <i>Investment Outlook</i> from <a href="http://www.pimco.com/">PIMCO</a>, home of the world&#8217;s largest bond fund.
</p>
<p>
If you&#8217;ve thought investment writing is stuffy, jargon laden, put you to sleep reading you may wish to read the monthly column from Bill Gross.  It&#8217;s very readable and highly informative.  As the lead paragraph shows, he knows more than the numbers of finance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jamhome.us/2009/10/midnight-candles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Innovation through Regulation</title>
		<link>http://www.jamhome.us/2009/06/innovation-through-regulation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jamhome.us/2009/06/innovation-through-regulation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamhome.us/?p=795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Respected publication The Economist lets loose a, to some, heretical notion: THE most important factor that led to America’s stunning success in information technology was not the free market but government regulation. Say what? Big, bad government regulation didn&#8217;t crush the creative impulse with stifling regulation? It was instead the most important factor supporting innovation? [...] <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.jamhome.us/2009/06/innovation-through-regulation/">Innovation through Regulation</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Respected publication <a href="http://www.economist.com/">The Economist</a> lets loose a, to some, heretical notion:
<div class="indent"><i>THE most important factor that led to America’s stunning success in information technology was not the free market but government regulation.</i></div>
<p>  Say what?  Big, bad government regulation didn&#8217;t crush the creative impulse with stifling regulation?  It was instead the <i>most</i> important factor supporting innovation?
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13766329&#038;fsrc=rss">Read all about it</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jamhome.us/2009/06/innovation-through-regulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Care Costs</title>
		<link>http://www.jamhome.us/2009/05/health-care-costs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jamhome.us/2009/05/health-care-costs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamhome.us/?p=762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Yorker has an excellent article on health care costs. It focuses on the Hildago county Texas area and it&#8217;s main city McAllen. This area has the second highest health care costs, as measured by health care spending, in the USA. It is second only to Miami. This is in stark contrast to El [...] <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.jamhome.us/2009/05/health-care-costs/">Health Care Costs</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<a href="http://www.newyorker.com">The New Yorker</a> has an <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/06/01/090601fa_fact_gawande?currentPage=all">excellent article</a> on health care costs.  It focuses on the Hildago county  Texas area and it&#8217;s main city McAllen.  This area has the second highest health care costs, as measured by health care spending, in the USA.  It is second only to Miami.  This is in stark contrast to El Paso county, about 800 miles up the Rio Grande,  a place with very similar demographics.  The spending in Hildago county is roughly twice that of El Paso county.  Are the citizens of Hildago county getting better care for all the extra spending?
<div class="indent">
Nor does the care given in McAllen stand out for its quality. Medicare ranks hospitals on twenty-five metrics of care. On all but two of these, McAllen’s five largest hospitals performed worse, on average, than El Paso’s. McAllen costs Medicare seven thousand dollars more per person each year than does the average city in America. But not, so far as one can tell, because it’s delivering better health care.
</div>
<p>Where is the money going?
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/06/01/090601fa_fact_gawande?currentPage=all">Read the article</a>.  The root cause is revealed in the first page or so.
</p>
<p>
But don&#8217;t stop there, near the beginning where, the high cost culprit is revealed.  Author Atul Gawande goes on to speak to his own experience as a doctor, when he bullied an admitting physician to keep his son overnight for observation.  This hospital stay, he realized after doing further research, was unnecessary.  Dr. Gawande also examines the practices of the Mayo Clinic and practitioners in Grand Junction Colorado.  Both of these have costs among the lowest in the nation while providing care that is close to the top available.   Those cases, where high quality care is provided at low cost, are the truly instructive ones.
</p>
<p>
Nor are these two cases special instances that cannot be repeated elsewhere:
</p>
<div class="indent">
<p>
Grand Junction’s medical community was not following anyone else’s recipe. But, like Mayo, it created what Elliott Fisher, of Dartmouth, calls an accountable-care organization. The leading doctors and the hospital system adopted measures to blunt harmful financial incentives, and they took collective responsibility for improving the sum total of patient care.
</p>
<p>
This approach has been adopted in other places, too: the Geisinger Health System, in Danville, Pennsylvania; the Marshfield Clinic, in Marshfield, Wisconsin; Intermountain Healthcare, in Salt Lake City; Kaiser Permanente, in Northern California. All of them function on similar principles. All are not-for-profit institutions. And all have produced enviably higher quality and lower costs than the average American town enjoys.
</p>
</div>
<p>
The money quote:  &#8220;[Lester Dyke, cardiac surgeon],  is among the few vocal critics of what’s happened in McAllen. “We took a wrong turn when doctors stopped being doctors and became businessmen,” he said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jamhome.us/2009/05/health-care-costs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Election Spending Perspective</title>
		<link>http://www.jamhome.us/2008/10/election-spending-perspective/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jamhome.us/2008/10/election-spending-perspective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamhome.us/?p=581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tired of campaign ads? Not too happy with the (obscene?) amount of money spent on election campaigning? You have lots of company. The Center for Responsive Politics estimates this US election cycle will cost $5.3Billion. Yow! For a point of comparison American&#8217;s spend over $6Billion on potato chips last year. So says the Snack Food [...] <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.jamhome.us/2008/10/election-spending-perspective/">Election Spending Perspective</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Tired of campaign ads?  Not too happy with the (obscene?) amount of money spent on election campaigning?  You have lots of company.  The Center for Responsive Politics estimates <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/10/us-election-will-cost-53-billi.html">this US election cycle will <b>cost $5.3Billion</b></a>.  Yow!
</p>
<p>
For a point of comparison American&#8217;s spend over $6Billion on potato chips last year.  <a href="http://www.sfa.org/potato150.aspx">So says the Snack Food Association</a>.
</p>
<p>
I wonder how much was spent on dip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jamhome.us/2008/10/election-spending-perspective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Birk Bunk</title>
		<link>http://www.jamhome.us/2008/10/birk-bunk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jamhome.us/2008/10/birk-bunk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Curiosity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamhome.us/?p=539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps you too have recieved this email: The Birk Economic Recovery Plan I'm against the $85,000,000,000.00 bailout of AIG. Instead, I'm in favor of giving $85,000,000,000 to America in a We Deserve It Dividend. To make the math simple, let's assume there are 200,000,000 bonafide U.S. Citizens 18+. Our population is about 301,000,000 +/- counting [...] <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.jamhome.us/2008/10/birk-bunk/">Birk Bunk</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Perhaps you too have recieved this email:
</p>
<p class="indent">
<pre>
The Birk Economic Recovery Plan

  I'm against the $85,000,000,000.00 bailout of AIG.

  Instead, I'm in favor of giving $85,000,000,000 to America in
  a We Deserve It Dividend.

  To make the math simple, let's assume there are 200,000,000
  bonafide U.S. Citizens 18+.

  Our population is about 301,000,000 +/- counting every man, woman
  and child. So 200,000,000 might be a fair stab at adults 18 and up..

  So divide 200 million adults 18+  into $85 billon that equals
  $425,000.00.

  My plan is to give $425,000 to every person 18+ as a
  We Deserve It Dividend.
</pre>
</p>
<p>
There is more, I&#8217;ve included the rest of the email below.  Simply stated the Birk plan is bunk.  All you need to know the truth of its bunkiness is to do the math.  As I wrote in an email to the last person who sent this to me:
</p>
<div class="indent">
<p>
<b>Sigh.</b>
</p>
<p>
While the literacy rate is often bemoaned little is said about the numeracy<br />
rate.
</p>
<p>
>   So pide 200 million adults 18+  into $85 billon that equals<br />
>   $425,000.00.
</p>
<p>
Got a calculator?  Got Excel?  Got the basic &#8220;simplify the problem&#8221; skills<br />
taught in high school math?
</p>
<p>
85,000,000,000 / 200,000,000 = 425
</p>
<p>
Riffing off of my last question
</p>
<p>
Remember canceling out to make things simple?
</p>
<p>
85,000,000,000 / 200,000,000 = 85,000,000 / 200,000 (drop the last set of 000,<br />
or divide both halves by 1000) <br />
&nbsp;&nbsp; and <br />
85,000,000 / 200,000  =  85,000 / 200  (drop the last set of 000 &#8230; ) <br />
&nbsp; &nbsp; and <br />
85,000 /200  =  8,500 / 20  = 850 / 2  = 425
</p>
<p>
Just reviewing the math says the Birk Plan is Bunk.
</p>
<p>
Pass the word&#8230;.
</p>
</div>
<p>
So please do, pass the work, show that Birk is Bunk.  Kill off this numeric meme.
</p>
<p class="indent">
<b>The rest of the bunky Birk email &hellip;</b></p>
<pre>
  Of course, it would NOT be tax free.
  So let's assume a tax rate of 30%.

  Every individual 18+ has to pay $127,500.00 in taxes.
  That sends $25,500,000,000 right back to Uncle Sam.

  But it means that every adult 18+ has $297,500.00 in their pocket.
  A husband and wife has $595,000.00.

  What would you do with $297,500.00 to $595,000.00 in your family?
  Pay off your mortgage - housing crisis solved.
  Repay college loans - what a great boost to new grads
  Put away money for college - it'll be there
  Save in a bank - create money to loan to entrepreneurs.
  Buy a new car - create jobs
  Invest in the market - capital drives growth
  Pay for your parent's medical insurance - health care improves
  Enable Deadbeat Dads to come clean - or else

  Remember this is for every adult U S Citizen 18+  including the folks
  who lost their jobs at Lehman Brothers and every other company
  that is cutting back. And of course, for those serving in our Armed
  Forces.

  If we're going to re-distribute wealth let's really do it...instead of
  trickling out a puny $1000.00 ( "vote buy" ) economic incentive that
  is being proposed by one of our candidates for President.

  If we're going to do an $85 billion bailout, let's bail out every adult
  US Citizen 18+!

  As for AIG - liquidate it.
  Sell off its parts.
  Let American General go back to being American General.
  Sell off the real estate. Let the private sector bargain hunters cut
  it up and clean it up.

  Here's my rationale. We deserve it and AIG doesn't.

  Sure it's a crazy idea that can "never work."

  But can you imagine the Coast-To-Coast Block Party!

  How do you spell Economic Boom?

  I trust my fellow adult Americans to know how to use the $85 Billion
  We Deserve It Dividend more than I do the geniuses at AIG or in
  Washington DC.

  And remember, The Birk plan only really costs $59.5 Billion because $25.5
  Billion is returned instantly in taxes to Uncle Sam.

  Ahhh...I feel so much better getting that off my chest.
      Kindest personal regards,

      Birk
</pre>
</p>
<p>
Bah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jamhome.us/2008/10/birk-bunk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bailout Criticism</title>
		<link>http://www.jamhome.us/2008/09/bailout-criticism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jamhome.us/2008/09/bailout-criticism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamhome.us/?p=531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Robert Greenwood at Salon.com comes a top ten list of what&#8217;s wrong with the bailout. Number 10 on the list: Whenever you think that the Government has done things so extreme that it can&#8217;t top itself &#8212; torture, theories of presidential lawbreaking, a six-year war justified by blatantly false pretenses &#8212; it always tops [...] <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.jamhome.us/2008/09/bailout-criticism/">Bailout Criticism</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
From Robert Greenwood at Salon.com comes a <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/09/29/bailout/index.html">top ten list of what&#8217;s wrong with the bailout</a>.  Number 10 on the list:
</p>
<p class="indent">
Whenever you think that the Government has done things so extreme that it can&#8217;t top itself &#8212; torture, theories of presidential lawbreaking, a six-year war justified by blatantly false pretenses &#8212; it always tops itself. On top of the massive debt under which the country was already drowning, another $700<br />
billion is now being added in order to save the nation&#8217;s richest individuals from the consequences of their own recklessness, allowing many of them not only to remain enriched, but become further enriched, all while basically ensuring that the Government is incapable of spending any money for years, if not longer, on programs designed to improve the lives of the vast, vast majority of its citizens &#8212; the same citizens who are forced to fund this bail-out. That seems hard to top, but the only thing certain is that they will<br />
find a way to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jamhome.us/2008/09/bailout-criticism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall Street Discontent</title>
		<link>http://www.jamhome.us/2008/09/wall-street-discontent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jamhome.us/2008/09/wall-street-discontent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 15:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamhome.us/?p=524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cliches: Wall Street votes Republican. Old white guys with lots of money are conservative. There are some strains in that relationship. One money manager expresses his deep unhappiness with Republicans. Unhappiness so deep they have, for the first time, lost his vote. I am a lifelong ( 51 years old) &#8220;rock-ribbed&#8221; conservative&#8230; What an eye [...] <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.jamhome.us/2008/09/wall-street-discontent/">Wall Street Discontent</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Cliches:  Wall Street votes Republican.  Old white guys with lots of money are conservative.
</p>
<p>
There are some strains in that relationship.  One money manager <a href="http://www.usnews.com/blogs/capital-commerce/2008/9/26/wall-street-to-gop-drop-dead.html">expresses  his deep unhappiness with Republicans</a>.  Unhappiness so deep they have, for the first time, lost his vote.
</p>
<p class="indent">
I am a lifelong ( 51 years old) &#8220;rock-ribbed&#8221; conservative&hellip; What an eye opener this week has been! I now realize what a blowhard Newt truly is by advocating the GOP bail on the Paulson Plan. As a professional money manager I can tell you I am shocked, dismayed and depressed that the Speaker would excoriate the GOP to abandon this plan which is URGENT and necessary to avoid a financial catastrophe that once commenced may be irreversible. The level of ignorance of financial and economic reality displayed by the Speaker , Rep. Boehner, Sen. Shelby , et al, has been frightening and sad. I thought the GOP had a better grasp of such matters than the Dems. Apparently not. And if this has been pure election gamesmanship as I suspect? The willingness to play politics with the U.S. financial markets is appalling and disgusting.
</p>
<p class="indent">
I am a huge Reagan fan and admirer.  I have voted GOP every election since 1976. Until now. Today. September 25, 2008. As soon as I finish this email I am going to try and get my $1000 McCain/Palin credit card donation back as I will not be voting GOP this year after watching this circus and the theatres passing as leadership displayed by the GOP. I am embarrassed to have been an erstwhile supporter of this gaggle of self-serving jerks. I hope the GOP lose their asses come November. They shall deserve it.
</p>
<p>
Ideology trumping good sense, ideology trumping national interests is costing Republicans votes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jamhome.us/2008/09/wall-street-discontent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buffett is Buying</title>
		<link>http://www.jamhome.us/2008/09/buffett-is-buying/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jamhome.us/2008/09/buffett-is-buying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamhome.us/?p=521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Warren Buffett has been on a buying spree this year. A big buying spree. How big? Consider this bit of an interview at CNBC. BECKY: Uh-oh. For the last nine months, Berkshire has spent a lot of that cash it&#8217;s been hoarding over the last several years. BUFFETT: That&#8217;s right. BECKY: I was trying to [...] <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.jamhome.us/2008/09/buffett-is-buying/">Buffett is Buying</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Warren Buffett has been on a buying spree this year.  A big buying spree.  How big?  Consider this bit of an <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/26869518/site/14081545/page/2/">interview at CNBC</a>.
</p>
<p class="indent">
<b>BECKY:</b>  Uh-oh.  For the last nine months, Berkshire has spent a lot of that cash it&#8217;s been hoarding over the last several years.
</p>
<p class="indent">
<b>BUFFETT:</b>  That&#8217;s right.
</p>
<p class="indent">
<b>BECKY:</b> I was trying to figure it out.  I think it&#8217;s about 24 billion dollars you&#8217;ve spent in the last nine months?
</p>
<p class="indent">
<b>BUFFETT:</b>  Yeah, we&#8217;ve spent a lot of money.  The money, the money we&#8217;ve spent, you know, we&#8217;ve found things we like to do.  It&#8217;s nice to have a lot of money, but you don&#8217;t want to keep it around forever.  I prefer buying things.  Otherwise it&#8217;s a little like saving up sex for your old age.  (Laughs.)  At some point, you&#8217;ve got to use it.  (Laughter.)
</p>
<p>
24 Billion?  Wow.   Are you investing more these days?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jamhome.us/2008/09/buffett-is-buying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
